Deploying Containerized LLMs to Unusual Architectures: From x86 to RISC-V+GPU

Ship LLM inference across unusual hardware: from x86 containers to RISC-V nodes with NVLink GPUs

Hook: If your CI/CD pipeline struggles to deploy large language model (LLM) workloads because target hardware is non-x86 (RISC-V) or uses novel GPU interconnects like NVLink Fusion, you aren’t alone. By 2026 we’re seeing SiFive and NVIDIA enable RISC-V to speak NVLink — but deploying LLMs there requires deliberate packaging, cross-compilation, and runtime work to maintain performance, reliability, and security.

Why this matters in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 brought two clear trends: vendor momentum behind RISC-V in datacenter-class silicon and increased availability of low-cost inference hardware (e.g., Raspberry Pi AI HAT+2 for edge). More importantly, SiFive’s announcements about integrating NVIDIA NVLink Fusion with RISC-V IP make heterogeneous RISC-V+GPU servers a reality for AI clusters. That changes packaging and deployment assumptions developers have relied on for x86 + CUDA-only stacks.

Key deployment implications

• Containers must be multi-arch-aware: the same image tag should work on x86 and riscv64 (or have clear fallbacks).
• Drivers, userland GPU libraries, and kernel modules remain host-managed — containers should include matching userland binaries built for the target architecture.
• Interconnects like NVLink mean high-speed GPU-to-GPU and CPU-to-GPU peer access; container runtime and host kernel must expose devices and enable peer memory features (GPUDirect).

High-level workflow

1. Build multi-arch base images and runtime artefacts (x86 and riscv64) using docker buildx or BuildKit and cross-toolchains.
2. Cross-compile vendor and inference libraries (TensorRT/ONNX Runtime) for riscv64 or use vendor-supplied riscv64 SDKs when available.
3. Package model files and runtime hooks in architecture-specific layers, keeping drivers off-container and using the host device plugin (NVIDIA device plugin / new RISC-V variants).
4. Use CI pipelines (GitHub Actions/GitLab) to test both emulated and real hardware paths: QEMU user-mode for smoke tests and hardware labs for performance verification.
5. Deploy with runtime flags that enable GPU access, NVLink peer access, and correct device capabilities (via NVIDIA toolkit or emerging RISC-V device plugins).

Practical: building multi-arch LLM runtime images

The practical path is to produce an image that has architecture-specific runtime layers. Example: your top-level image includes model files and app logic; separate layers contain compiled inference binaries per-arch.

Register QEMU and enable buildx

# register QEMU handlers (for emulation during builds)
docker run --rm --privileged tonistiigi/binfmt:latest --install all

docker buildx create --use --name multiarch

Directory layout

./
├─ models/                # GGUF / quantized files (arch-independent)
├─ app/                   # python/fastapi app
├─ docker/                # Dockerfiles and build scripts
│  ├─ Dockerfile.common
│  ├─ Dockerfile.riscv64
│  └─ Dockerfile.amd64
└─ ci/                    # build and test workflows

Example Dockerfile strategy (multi-stage)

Two-stage pattern: compile native inference libs in a small build image for the target arch, then copy into a runtime image. Keep drivers off-container and include only userland libs compatible with host drivers.

# docker/Dockerfile.riscv64
FROM riscv64/ubuntu:24.04 AS builder
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y build-essential cmake git python3-dev
# Clone and build ONNX Runtime or vendor SDK for riscv64
RUN git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime.git /tmp/onnx && \
    cd /tmp/onnx && mkdir build && cd build && cmake .. && make -j$(nproc)

FROM riscv64/ubuntu:24.04 AS runtime
# copy runtime libs only; avoid bundling kernel modules or full driver stacks
COPY --from=builder /tmp/onnx/build/libonnxruntime.so /usr/local/lib/
COPY app /opt/app
WORKDIR /opt/app
ENV LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
CMD ["python3", "serve.py"]

Build and push multi-arch image

# buildx build both amd64 and riscv64 and push
docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/riscv64 \
  -t registry.example.com/llm-runtime:1.0.0 \
  -f docker/Dockerfile.common --push .

Note: using QEMU emulation is fine for smoke tests and packaging, but you'll need real riscv64 hardware to validate GPU-NVLink performance.

Cross-compilation considerations

Cross-compilation is the critical bridge between x86 CI agents and RISC-V target nodes. Options:

• Build on riscv64 CI runners — simplest for correctness; maintain a small farm of riscv64 build runners or use cloud providers offering RISC-V instances.
• Cross-toolchains — use riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc and musl or glibc sysroots to produce userland binaries; integrate into buildx or use crosstool-ng.
• QEMU user-mode during CI — good for packaging and minimal tests; avoid for performance-sensitive validation.

Cross-compile checklist

• Use a consistent C library: match host kernel/userland (glibc vs musl) to avoid subtle runtime failures.
• Version-match userland GPU libs with host drivers. Containers should not ship kernel modules — drivers are host-side.
• Provide multiple build targets: static (where possible) for portability, and dynamic for smaller images and better compatibility with vendor runtime libs.

Runtime: exposing GPUs and NVLink to containers

When you run containers that use GPUs, you depend on the host to expose devices and set up interconnect features. For NVIDIA ecosystems on x86 you typically use the nvidia-container-toolkit and the device plugin in Kubernetes. For RISC-V + NVLink, vendors are shipping equivalents; the principles are the same.

Docker run example (x86 and future riscv64 parity)

# host must have NVIDIA drivers and nvidia-container-toolkit installed
docker run --rm --gpus "device=0" \
  -e NVIDIA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=all \
  -e NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES=compute,utility \
  registry.example.com/llm-runtime:1.0.0

For RISC-V NVLink systems, expect a vendor device plugin and a similar runtime hook. You’ll need to:

• Ensure the host kernel has NVLink/GPUDirect and peer memory modules enabled.
• Install vendor-provided riscv64 userland libs (libcuda, libcudart) so container userland matches.
• Enable any required pod annotations or runtimeClass for NVLink peer capabilities in Kubernetes.

Kubernetes pod example (conceptual)

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: llm-infer
  annotations:
    nvlink.example.com/enable: "true"  # vendor-specific
spec:
  containers:
  - name: server
    image: registry.example.com/llm-runtime:1.0.0
    resources:
      limits:
        nvidia.com/gpu: 2  # or riscv-nvidia/gpu depending on plugin
    env:
    - name: NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES
      value: "compute,utility"

Replace annotation keys with vendor-specific ones once you have the RISC-V NVLink device plugin installed.

Inference framework choices and porting

Popular inference stacks in 2026 include TensorRT (NVIDIA), ONNX Runtime, Triton Inference Server, and lightweight engines like llama.cpp/ggml. Porting these to riscv64 has different complexity:

• llama.cpp / ggml — easiest: minimal native C/C++ with limited dependencies; cross-compile easily and works well for CPU or CUDA bindings if vendor provides GPU hooks.
• ONNX Runtime — moderate: requires building with proper providers for CUDA or any vendor acceleration layer.
• TensorRT and Triton — harder: tightly coupled to NVIDIA stacks; relies on vendor SDKs. Expect vendor-provided riscv64 builds or work with vendors for support.

Recommendation:

• Keep the model loading and orchestration in architecture-independent code (Python with portability shims).
• Ship inference kernels and vendor-accelerated providers as architecture-specific plugins or layers.
• Use quantized models (GGUF) for reduced memory and faster cold-starts on resource-constrained riscv64 nodes.

Model packaging: performance and size trade-offs

Large models are best stored separately and mounted into containers or fetched on startup via an artifact store (S3/MinIO). For RISC-V deployments:

• Use quantized formats (8-bit/4-bit, GGUF) to lower VRAM needs and speed up inference.
• Prefer memory-mapped model loaders where supported — these reduce startup time.
• Keep model files architecture-independent where possible; the binary kernels that interpret them are arch-specific.

CI/CD: testing across architectures

To reduce surprises, integrate multi-arch checks into your pipelines.

Practical CI matrix

• Stage 1 (fast): linting, unit tests on x86.
• Stage 2 (smoke): QEMU-emulated riscv64 builds and smoke tests — use buildx and lightweight runtime tests.
• Stage 3 (performance): run inference benchmarks on real riscv64+NVLink hardware (lab or cloud). This should gate release to production images.

Operational and security concerns

Keep these items in your ops checklist:

• Driver compatibility: Userland CUDA libs in the container must be compatible with host drivers. Coordinate driver and userland versions.
• Least privilege: Don’t run inference engines as root. Use fine-grained cgroup and device permissions for GPUs. For stricter identity and permission models see guidance on identity risk and controls (least privilege).
• Image size: Separate heavy SDKs into build-time layers and keep runtime images minimal.
• Telemetry: Export GPU memory, NVLink bandwidth, and IPC stats to Prometheus for capacity planning.
• Secure model storage: Use sealed secrets or a secure key-management-backed fetch mechanism for private models.

Troubleshooting checklist

1. Container fails to see GPU: verify host drivers installed and nvidia-container-toolkit (or vendor runtime) enabled.
2. Performance lower than expected: confirm NVLink peer access enabled in kernel and that GPUDirect is active.
3. Binary execution errors on riscv64: check glibc vs musl mismatch; run ldd on binaries to confirm dependencies.
4. Model load fails: confirm model file path, mmapped loading compatibility, and memory limits (cgroups).

Case study (conceptual): porting quantized Llama stack to RISC-V+NVLink

Scenario: You have a quantized Llama 2 GGUF model serving via a FastAPI wrapper using ONNX Runtime on x86 with CUDA. Goal: run on riscv64 host with NVLink-connected GPUs.

1. Separate model files (GGUF) into an S3 bucket and keep the same model access code for all architectures.
2. Cross-compile ONNX Runtime with a CUDA provider for riscv64 — or use a vendor-provided ONNX RT build for riscv64 that exposes NVLink-aware providers.
3. Build a riscv64 runtime image that copies onnxruntime.so, lightweight Python app, and model loader; do not include drivers.
4. Deploy to a riscv64 node with host-side NVIDIA driver and NVLink kernel modules. Use the vendor device plugin to allocate GPUs to the pod.
5. Run microbenchmarks: single-GPU latency, NVLink multi-GPU scaling, and end-to-end throughput. Tune batch sizes and activation offloading accordingly.

Advanced strategies and future predictions (2026+)

• Expect vendors to ship prebuilt riscv64 userland SDKs (CUDA-equivalents) and container runtime hooks optimized for NVLink Fusion.
• Model parallelism over NVLink will be a standard for large-LM inference on RISC-V clusters; orchestration engines will add NVLink-topology-aware schedulers.
• Edge inference stacks will converge: smaller riscv64 inference nodes (with GPU HATs) will take on local LLM workloads, while large riscv64+NVLink servers handle heavy batch inference.

Actionable takeaways

• Start small: containerize your app with architecture-independent model handling and add arch-specific runtime layers.
• Automate multi-arch builds: use docker buildx + QEMU for packaging and maintain riscv64 build runners for validation.
• Don’t ship drivers: rely on host-provided kernel modules and drivers; include only matching userland libraries built for riscv64.
• Prioritize testing on real hardware: emulation is helpful for CI speed, but NVLink performance and GPUDirect require physical validation.

Further reading & references (2025–2026)

• SiFive + NVIDIA NVLink Fusion integration announcements (late 2025) — indicates vendor momentum for RISC-V in AI servers.
• Hardware announcements for accessible inference HATs and edge accelerators (2025/2026) showing the expanding heterogenous landscape.

Final checklist before production

• Multi-arch images pushed and signed to registry.
• CI matrix: x86 unit tests, QEMU riscv64 smoke tests, hardware performance gate.
• Host drivers and device plugins installed on production nodes (NVLink modules enabled).
• Monitoring and alerts for NVLink bandwidth, GPU memory pressure, and model-serving latencies.

Call to action: Ready to test a sample repo and CI pipeline that builds an LLM runtime for both x86 and riscv64? Clone our starter template, run the buildx workflow, and validate on a riscv64 lab node or cloud instance. If you need help setting up build runners or vendor SDKs, reach out — we help teams go from prototype to production on RISC-V + NVLink clusters.

Related Reading

• From Micro-App to Production: CI/CD and Governance for LLM-Built Tools
• Developer Productivity and Cost Signals in 2026: Polyglot Repos, Caching and Multisite Governance
• Observability in 2026: Subscription Health, ETL, and Real-Time SLOs for Cloud Teams
• Field Review: Compact Edge Appliance for Indie Showrooms — Hands-On (2026)
• Master Sword Math: Probability and Combinatorics with MTG and Booster Packs
• Live-Streaming Open Water Swims: Using Bluesky LIVE Badges and Alternatives Safely
• When Networks Fail: How to Claim Verizon’s $20 Credit and Push for Better Outage Compensation
• Resume Bullet Examples for Security Engineers: Demonstrating Legacy System Remediation
• How YouTube’s Monetization Changes Affect Mental Health Creators and Their Audiences